SCuLE Researchers Published a Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report

SCuLE researchers Dr Mathilde Pavis and Dr Andrea Wallace published a Statement on Intellectual Property Rights and Open Access relevant to the digitization and restitution of African Cultural Heritage and associated materials in response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report.

The Sarr-Savoy Report was commissioned by the French government and outlines a plan for the restitution of African Cultural Heritage held by French cultural institutions and museums. One of the recommendations of the Sarr-Savoy Report encourages the digitization and sharing of digitized and digital materials destined for restitution.

The Response by Pavis and Wallace challenges the recommendation put forward by the Sarr-Savoy Report regarding the digitization and management of cultural objects designated for restitution.

Pavis and Wallace argue that intellectual property rights and access policies should be considered by the French Government as part of the restitution process. Going further, Pavis and Wallace explain that questions of intellectual property rights, open access and digitization of materials designated for restitution ought to be discussed with and decided by communities of origin. This applies to the cultural objects and any associated materials, such as archival content.

In their response, Pavis and Wallace note the following:

  • The Sarr-Savoy Report’s recommendations on digitization and access risk placing the French Government in a position of returning Africa’s Material Cultural Heritage while retaining control over the Africa’s Digital Cultural Heritage
  • The validity of intellectual property claims in digital materials and the implementation of open access policies are contested and subject to increasing global legal and social controversy.
  • Requiring African Cultural Heritage to be digitized and made available when the same demands are not made of France’s national institutions could lead to a creation of a double standard.
  • Allowing the digitization and open access of materials held in France must not condition the restitution. Such decisions should be made by African communities of origin that must enjoy full autonomy in devising any access strategies for resituted material and digital cultural heritage.
  • The decolonisation of French institutions of African Material Cultural Heritage must include treatment of archival and digital materials, including those remaining in France. France should consider the opportunity to aid African communities in this process, both practically and financially, alongside other forms of reparation.

Pavis and Wallace’s Response to the 2018 Sarr-Savoy Report has been signed by 108 scholars and practitioners working in the fields of intellectual property law and material and digital cultural heritage at universities, heritage institutions and organizations around the world.

The Response was featured in the Times, and Dr Pavis and Dr Wallace were invited to contribute to a podcast with Museopunks: ‘Episode 41: Digitization is not neutral’.

Download the full Report on Zenodo

See the Report on JIPITEC (in open access)